Subject: Aviation User Charges
Approved: February
20,1985
Revised: October 3,1987
Revised: May 6, 1999
Revised: October 13, 2000
Preamble
The costs of providing
air navigation services and airports are recovered from users as user
charges, fees and/or taxes. Business aviation is therefore directly affected
by the related policies of ICAO, States, Regional bodies, Air Navigation
Service Providers and Airport Authorities/Operators.
Charges for the provision
of other services e.g. Customs, Immigration and Security are also of concern
to business aviation.
The objective of IBAC
Policy is to achieve fair and equitable treatment of business aviation.
Policy
It is IBAC policy
:
With respect to Non-discrimination
Charges should not
discriminate against civil aviation, including in relation to other modes
of transportation.
With respect to Revenue
Appropriation
The revenue generated
from charges, fees and/or taxes imposed on aviation users is for the benefit
of civil aviation and should not be used for any other purpose.
With respect to Cost-based
Principle
Charges should be
cost- based for those aeronautical facilities and services which have
a direct relationship with, and specifically benefit civil aviation operations.
The cost base must be determined using sound cost accounting methods,
be transparent and available for user scrutiny.
With respect to Public
and Socio-economic benefits
Civil aviation is
important for society, therefore facilities and services should not be
addressed in isolation but as part of a State’s national or regional
transportation systems policy. Funding for civil aviation infrastructure
should therefore be supported by general revenues collected by the State
or region.
With respect to Government
Responsibilities
Governments should
refrain from imposing charges for services which are their primary responsibility
viz. for security, immigration and customs.
With respect to Consultation
Charges, including
increases thereof, should be imposed only after consultation with users,
including business aviation .
With respect to Cost
allocation
IBAC accepts the principle
that the users of various aviation facilities and services should pay
charges based on a pro rata, allocated and reasonable share of the costs
of providing and operating such facilities and services.
With respect to ICAO
Policy
IBAC supports the
policy guidance for States approved by the ICAO Council which is published
in ICAO Document 9082 “ Statements by the Council to Contracting
States on Charges for Airport and Air Navigation Services.”
IBAC urges States
to adhere to these Statements.
With respect to Economic
Regulation
Commercial, including
Privatized entities, when such exist, such as Air Navigation Services
Providers or Airport Operators, with monopoly status and imposing charges
on users should be within the jurisdiction of a national Competition Bureau,
Monopolies Commission or equivalent body.
With respect to Search
and Rescue
Search and Rescue
(SAR) Services are a humanitarian obligation of States, for the benefit
of society as a whole. Therefore SAR costs should be financed by public
funds.
With respect to Aerodrome
Rescue and Fire Fighting Services
The availability and
extent of Aerodrome Rescue and Fire Fighting Services (RFFS) should be
determined on the basis of an overall risk assessment/risk management
process in consultation with operators. The provision of RFFS should be
subsidized from general revenues.
With respect to En-route
Charges
The use of aircraft
mass as an inversely proportional factor in the computation of charges,
although intended to ensure that large aircraft are not treated inequitably,
has the effect of under-recovering from users with the ability to pay
and who generally derive higher value from the services provided.
Source of Policy:
(1) Original, Governing Board, Montreal, February 19-20, 1985
(2) Revision, Governing
Board, New Orleans, October 2-3, 1987
(3) Revision, Governing
Board, Montreal, May 6-7, 1999
(4) Revision, Governing
Board, New Orleans, October 13, 2000